Corrections to the ATC'18 paper "HashKV: Enabling Efficient Updates in KV
Storage via Hashing"

*************************************************************************
August 10, 2018

+ Page 9, Left Column: The following description on HashKV performance is
incorrect.  "Both vLog and HASHKV have lower throughput than LevelDB and
RocksDB when the KV pair size is 256B, ....".  When the KV pair size is 256B,
the update throughput of HashKV is actually higher than LevelDB. The sentence
should read 

   "Both vLog and HASHKV have lower throughput than RocksDB when the KV
    pair size is 256B, ...."

+ Page 10, Figure 10(b): Typo in the unit of the y-axis label "Write size
(TiB)". The y-axis label should read "Write size (GiB)". 

The version on http://www.cse.cuhk.edu.hk/~pclee/www/pubs/atc18.pdf is the
corrected version.